Reflection
on the past few days, 20th February 2017
I had
the equivalent of four days, spread over five, to produce the finalised pieces,
which experience told me would be adequate, although in the end it was quite a
squeeze.
As I
mentioned in this Week 56 blogpost
, when I looked at the sketches again, it was immediately clear that they were
too complex and fractured to work up into finished pieces. The first job was
therefore to simplify them. I'd expected this to take a couple of hours but it
took all Wednesday afternoon. I had stretched and gessoed the two sheets of
paper, so I was working over two separate boards on two mixed-media paintings
that should combine to one piece. I decided to risk putting the simplified
design straight onto the gessoed paper but hadn't realised how well the paper
would take the graphite - in other words, it was more or less impossible to
erase. The shapes I produced in the reworked design were not as pleasing as the
originals, but given the time constraints and the graphite issue, I had to go
with them. In retrospect I should have drawn the new design onto tracing paper
in the exact size I wanted. Sketching onto gessoed paper is not an option! A
learning point.
Design drawn onto paper on board |
In
contrast, on Thursday afternoon, the first layer of paint went on well. I was
impressed how well the paper took the paint. I worked with the acrylics (both
System 3 and Liquitex Basics) straight from the tube. I decided to work the
earth and red-based colours from top left to bottom right, from light to dark
and back. The blue and green-based colours went from top right to bottom left
and from dark to light and back. It was (for me) an ambitious experiment in
handling colour and balance. I started at the top left with neutral colours and
worked from there.
In
essence the colours worked out for themselves where they would go, which was
unexpected and welcome. I painted quite a lot of the top panel before
attempting the bottom panel. This necessitated quite a bit of walking round
both panels in an attempt to get some kind of balance and composition. The idea
of looking at a piece in 360 degrees was something I learnt when doing the four
pylon pieces last Summer.
On Friday
I added some shapes in masking fluid and in white acrylic, with a view to
overpainting in the second layer. The idea was to add further shapes over the
second layer of paint to go under a third layer. However, when I added the
second layer on Saturday, the colour took much more deeply than I'd expected
and a third layer simply wasn't going to work. I therefore added further shapes
and simply scraped some paint over these areas. In the end I decided to paint
the roads white. I did toy with the idea of putting some charcoal and/or grey
into the final coat but I got to the point where I felt that I was possibly
saying, "oh look, I thought of doing this too!" rather than it adding
to the piece.
On Friday
I also tested the idea of adding some small squares in a kind of “tile”
pattern. The “tiles” are cut from a print of the Mabgate office building (see
this week 51 blogpost) and a picture of the City of Mabgate pub photocopied
onto acetate. They are therefore all monochrome black and white, but show very
different tones, and the acetate and paper show different textures. This all seemed fine and I expected it to
take half a day to stick them on. However, when I came to do it on the Sunday,
it took most of the day. The curves of the roads were quite difficult to work
round. It also became apparent as I applied the tiles that this part of the
painting was probably really a work in its own right, despite me testing it. As I was under time pressure, there
was little else I could do but persevere.
On
Friday I’d also experimented with placing some of the letters that I’d lasercut the previous week
onto the paintings. I found it quite inconclusive as I didn’t know whether the
manilla or the grey worked better. I’d tried the letters cut from the acetate
photocopy of the Mabgate pub, but they didn’t look right. However, once I’d got
some pieces of the same image as part of the “tiles” on the Sunday, they seemed
to work best so I used these.
I’m not
really sure whether I like the outcomes or not. There are areas where I really
like the colour – there is a kind of luminosity – but the tiles really need to
be in a piece of their own. I did learn a lot about colour and paint, though.
However, there isn’t enough complexity in the layering. I should have used more
shapes and more letters. I’m also unsure about the roads being white. But I
achieved what I’d set out to do, which was to produce some work based on the
methodology I’d developed through my dissertation, of a size and format
commensurate with the journey I would have to make over the Pennines and the area I was going to display them in. The
ideas have also come a long way since their original concept. I will submit
these pieces as part of my portfolio. They are finalised, although not
necessarily “finished” – there is a lot of reflection to do about how to
develop the ideas from here.
Monday got quite pressed for time too. I ended up having to cut the mounts for the prints by hand (with a lot of help from Nick). Having learnt how to make them in Illustrator, I'd cut them on the laser at college at lunchtime, but they'd burnt. Having tried it on two different cutters, it was clear that someone had been messing with the settings, but both technicians were teaching so I just had to leave it (and waste about £3 in mountboard - grr).
Monday got quite pressed for time too. I ended up having to cut the mounts for the prints by hand (with a lot of help from Nick). Having learnt how to make them in Illustrator, I'd cut them on the laser at college at lunchtime, but they'd burnt. Having tried it on two different cutters, it was clear that someone had been messing with the settings, but both technicians were teaching so I just had to leave it (and waste about £3 in mountboard - grr).
No comments:
Post a Comment