Reflection
on “Changing Lives” : the 9th Manchester Metropolitan University PGR
conference, 22nd February 2017
Getting there and setting up
And so the big
day arrived. I wasn't sure if my swollen foot and my stamina would last the day
out, but in the event they did. It was an early start but I made it to
Manchester in good time. A couple of unexpected problems: the boards were not
the tall ones I'd been promised and there were no name labels. I worked with
what I had although the pieces would have looked better if I could have hung
them higher.
Feeling quite proud next to my installation |
Attending some of the talks
There were two
viewing and judging phases for the artworks, so I did a bit of mingling and
attended some of the talks. I fell into conversation with, and subsequently
attended a talk by, a Healthcare Postgraduate Researcher (PGR) called Lorna.
She had used phenomenology to generate a methodology to investigate nurses'
experiences of the quality of patient care. Her work involved being-ness and
what it means "to be". It was fascinating to think that some similar
ideas and approaches underpinned both her research and my own. Does the
recognition of this open an entry route for interdisciplinary research?
Speaking of
interdisciplinary researchers - so was the first keynote speaker, Sam Illingworth,
a Science Communication lecturer at MMU. He used one slide for his 40 minute
keynote, which was impressive! A former physicist, he realised the need to
communicate how science can empower society and to interact with people using
that "science". He uses poetry and broke into verse several times
during the talk. He was hugely engaging and clearly a natural performer. The
only thing that grated was his use of the terms "experts" and
"non-experts" when talking about co-creating knowledge (the latest
research buzzphrase, evidently). The “experts” are the scientists, e.g.
researching flooding, and the “non-experts” are the people who experience
whatever the experts are investigating, e.g. having their houses flooded. To my
mind it's the other way round.
Some of the
lightning talks (3 minutes and one slide to explain your research) were
interesting. Most of them had too much information on the slide in my humble opinion.
The one that won had a picture of a water lily and a message about happiness.
The research was about pain management and trying to restore happiness. Well
thought out and accessible.
I also attended
one of the sessions of talks in the afternoon and learnt variously about the
North West’s early motor clubs, the role of public libraries in delivering life
long learning activities, and the novel “Fight Club”. Such an incredible
variety of research and all really interesting, particularly the Libraries
talk.
Meeting others: engaging with other
attendees
After Lorna’s
talk in the morning I went back to my installation. I was right at the back of
the artists’ area and I felt like it was the worst position, but there was
little I could do about it. I would have liked much more footfall round the
exhibition. My main aims were (a) to invite people comment on what they saw in
the pieces, and (b) to canvass opinion about whether the paintings and the
prints worked together or were too disparate.
Looking down on the exhibition space My installation was right at the back, near the red framework |
My first
conversation was with Kathryn, a Manchester-based artist who is interested in
Psychogeography. She picked up on the fact that the paintings formed a map,
which I was pleased about, and commented that the prints had a kind of texture,
like fabric, and that they looked like they could be unpicked. Another
conversation, with Chloe, a sports science PGR, provided another viewpoint. She
thought of the paintings as a journey; the map might depict a physical journey,
which is responded to via the colours of the painting at the higher level, and
then by the "tiles" at the most detailed level. So plenty of food for
thought from those two conversations.
Both Kathryn
and Chloe thought the paintings and prints worked fine together, as did
Philippa, a fashion PGR who was exhibiting next to me and who is investigating
the gendering of clothing.
I had a long conversation
with a PGR called Jennie from MMU who is also using psychogeographical
techniques, but responding via poetry rather than visual means. It was
fantastic to speak to someone who “got” what I was trying to do and who did
something similar but using a different genre to create outcomes.
Mohammad is a
pharmacology PGR at Aston University. I struggled to explain my process and my
research to him; I think he expected the map in the paintings to be literal and
wasn’t clear why it wasn’t. It made me realise what an Arty/Psychogeographical
bubble I’ve got myself into! A learning point. I was gratified, though, that a
physical science student like him made the effort to visit the art exhibition.
The main part
of my installation that people were drawn to were the tiles. I hung back from
my display a bit and saw an international student have a good look at them, and
another touch them. There is something tactile about the tiles and this is
definitely an area to take forward.
Meeting others: talking with other artists
It felt like it
was a really nice group of artists exhibiting – twelve in all - and everyone
seemed to be showing something quite different. A few of the others had more
interactive exhibits than mine, and these generated more interest amongst the
attendees. I could see why - being able to do or handle or experience something
is probably more interesting than looking at something.
One of the
artists, Stacey, is using art to interact with dementia patients in care homes.
She has been making and collecting a series of objects to open up conversations
with such people and has also created a wallpaper backdrop, intended to
simulate a familiar lounge environment. Her installation effectively formed a
pop-up front room and I sat there with her for a while, which was lovely and
calm.
Another artist,
Lin, was doing something with the sentience of plants. Her installation was interactive
and very popular. A designer called Sean from the University of Huddersfield is
investigating ways of simplifying and extending Braille, and invited everyone
to write their name in Braille.
"Ann" in Braille |
Summary of feedback and reflections
- It was a long, tiring day but interesting and useful
- Take everything I need to put up the work, including laminated abstracts
- I need to be much clearer in my explanation of my processes and outcomes for non-artist audiences – “escape the bubble” of my own specialisms
- Lots of researchers are interested in place/space/psychogeography- this is good!
- Think about doing something more interactive next time??
- The tiles were the most successful part of my installation
- The paintings and the prints work fine together and there is no tension about exhibiting two different media side by side